Update 2012: more hardcopies from Henri Moufettal here
MBA the Magic Bible of Arts, reviewed and formatted. http://www.lulu.com/product/couverture-souple/mba-the-magic-bible-of-arts/18814696
And another ones in English on the stage:
Play the brackets on stage, reviewed and formatted http://www.lulu.com/product/couverture-souple/play-the-brackets-on-stage/18814451
And the last one in French, L'autre rivage, revu en couleurs, http://www.lulu.com/product/couverture-souple/lautre-rivage/18811927
Update 27/05/2011
While i do understand not so long ago disinformation was very harmful, I do feel journalism have balanced to the other extreme, looking to release too much information, unsettling our references at every moment of the decade, of the year, of the month, of the day, of the hour, of the minute, of the second.
I do understand as well I am making a generality here. I do believe Marianne and Rue89 are acting closed to good and near the surface but still I am pretty angry to most of what I can read and see. Yes I want to be informed, so yes I am looking at it, but I am pissed off. So yes I am allowing myself a generality, like they do.
I believe I was up much more with French journalism when it relied to context, development, conclusion rather than the anglo-saxon ones relying on facts, facts, facts, where they even made rumors lie into facts… and where we are all aiming to
What I am interested in journalism is their power to take a fact, and here not a rumor, put it in context, not bragging about every twitter like facts that leads ourselves to be more disinformed than informed.
Respect the timeline, please. You have a respected position in our society to INFORM people.
You are not to do the job any advertisers putting up their lying campaign (Last one I've seen was the ad about the bank CIC, stating they don't have shareholders, well their financial statements state different and I do believe Credit Agricole is not a shareholder just for fun.)
And more, there are others journals dealing with such segments, why do you look at these segments? to see copies? that is a poor view on the short term which gonna harm the long term viability of your business, especially at a critical time where everything is online, I do expect more from print copies
And more, there are others journals dealing with such segments, why do you look at these segments? to see copies? that is a poor view on the short term which gonna harm the long term viability of your business, especially at a critical time where everything is online, I do expect more from print copies
Latest examples:
The crash of the AF447 and the pilot not being in the cockpit, and here it goes, mounting headlines on headlines,
DSK and his new expensive house, his ADN and so on, these are facts that are not very useful, lost in a series of rumors that does prove to give any more clues. I have to come back on one earlier comments there, I am more commenting on the justice and its environment rather than the fact itself and its fair use for various communities to defend their fight. Everything has to come in time, not in a bowling mix.
So, following the amount of nonsense and disbelief put in their columns, I will read again a traditionnal newspaper once one has decided to publish a blank front page, given they 'd rather focus on buzz, rather than information.
Meanwhile, I 'd rather pick up information from sources I can secure valuable even if it can be less. less is sometimes giving a better picture, more sense. Meanwhile, I spoke too much.


No comments:
Post a Comment