Magic Bible Arts – Extrait 15
don't make articles any more than record labels make music, writers make articles and musicians make music. Newspapers and record companies are in the distribution business. Today, journalists and columnists can live without newspapers. Newspapers, however, cannot live without journalists and columnists. Google and Apple (in this case) are on the side of content generators, giving them a way to get distribution and get paid (if they're any good) without middlemen. This discussion got short as looking back on it, they agreed more than they disagreed Cash is king, Content is emperor. As of conclusion, a final quick spell breezed over: With no contents, there are no distribution. Distributing what? With no distribution, one has to search for contents and value it, reason why customer centric business is the future. As we were moving towards a technological society, the distribution system got totally rethought, taking shortcuts that only technology could offer. Now, we are deeply in a technological society. How will we promote further contents, the kind of critical one that makes us unsettled, and rethink. For most of what Edward understands, writers and philosophers are not writing simply to get rich, they are writing to enrich. E-Interaction is the distribution of the present, and well more than a simple distribution, it is the value of our present. Still, how the mechanism of voicing out concerns away from standards is taking place once only some keys stakeholders have achieved the critical mass to overview it all and reach each of us? Well, embrace the distribution, you still own your contents. Music: Fatboy Slim Right here, right now HYPERLINK "file:///C:\\Users\\Dobson\\Desktop\\IS%20it%20best%20to%20go%20for%20content%20or%20distribution.doc" \l "_ftnref1" \o "" [1] Source: HYPERLINK "http://www.20minutes.fr/article/631255/media-apple-google-defies-partie-presse-francaise" http://www.20minutes.fr/article/631255/media-apple-google-defies-partie-presse-francaise Chapter 8: Entering the black bible of Mankiw's ten principles of economics Ouf I did not attend the same university as Mankiw I believe the corporate belief would have make me lying even more to myself. I would have feared for the critical thinking aspect I've been told we've got to improve. Well, I've got my values, and no I am not looking to change them, it s what makes me rational, efficient, and go forward taking the most of every single mistake. With no background money-wise and market-wise, only common-sense realism, I will have a ten-minutes go here to explain why the economics field is still trying to assert they are useful and that in that case cannot go further, as most of us can disagree and see alternatives to a market wise rule of thumb over the world. 1) People face trade-offs. It s the basic of existentialism. Making a choice, right or wrong, it s part of human freedom and depending of the knowledge and acceptance of the uncertainty involved in the subject, it could get everybody better off, everybody worst off, or as we see in a market ruled world, some better and a lot worst off 2) The cost of something is what you give up to get it. No, the cost of something is an exchange you are involved in. Your work is adding value to one product of your own, and you are getting that in the balance to get some other goods. 3) Rational people think at the margin. Rational people are only a bit of the global population, and fortunately we are more irrational because emotional, and that s what makes us human, hence economics stealing from the field of humanism here 4) People respond to incentives. If they care. As said in the video it s a tautologies, I am motivated by my own motivations, if I am not motivated would be extra difficult to get an external factor to motivate me. Its centering on
⬅️ Extrait précédent | Extrait suivant ➡️
🔖 Labels : MBA Magic Bible of Arts, Magic Bible Arts – Extrait 15
No comments:
Post a Comment